Personal Prosecution

This graphic titled “An Act of Personal Prosecution” offers a vivid and vital framework for how biblical confession should function in soul care. The image of someone both standing outside the courtroom and inside it—simultaneously prosecutor and defendant—captures the intentional humility and clarity of conscience required for meaningful, God-honoring reconciliation.

What Is Personal Prosecution?

Personal prosecution is the act of bringing a thorough, self-incriminating case against yourself when you’ve sinned, not in self-pity, not in vague sorrow, but in detailed confession that leaves no room for misunderstanding. It’s as if you’ve stepped into a courtroom, picked up the gavel, and said to the person you offended, “Here is exactly how I have wronged you, and I deserve your judgment.”

This is the kind of confession that flows from godly sorrow, the kind Paul describes in 2 Corinthians 7:10, not superficial regret, but sorrow that leads to repentance without regret. It’s very different from the cultural “I’m sorry” which often serves as a conversational escape hatch rather than a moral reckoning. “I’m sorry you were hurt” is not the same as “I sinned against you by belittling your efforts and exalting myself.”

Think of David in Psalm 51. He does not hide behind generalities or vague admissions. He says plainly, “Against You, You only, have I sinned.” He owns the offense in full, without dilution or excuse.

Why Vague Apologies Undermine Reconciliation

When someone offers a half-hearted or vague apology, even with polite Christian words, it often leaves the offended party confused or doubting. You may have experienced this: the person says, “I’m sorry for what I said; will you forgive me?” but you’re left thinking, What exactly are they sorry for? Do they even understand what they did? That kind of confession feels more like a formality than heart-level repentance. It’s more transactional than transformational. Though you want to be charitable, you’re struggling.

This ambiguity can become a stumbling block for the person trying to extend forgiveness. Outwardly they say, “I forgive you,” but inwardly, they’re still unsettled. Their conscience won’t rest because the offense hasn’t truly been dealt with, only smoothed over. This can lead to a lingering sense of distrust or unresolved tension, even if both parties claim they’ve “moved on.”

Case Study: Mable’s Casual Apology

Mable and Biff have had a recurring tension in their marriage. In their latest argument, Mable snapped at Biff and dismissed one of his concerns with sarcasm and contempt. The next day, she said, “I’m sorry for what I said to you; will you forgive me?” Biff, trying to walk in grace, responded with, “I forgive you.” But something didn’t sit right.

This wasn’t the first time Mable had offered a quick, formulaic apology. There were no specific words of confession, no clear naming of the offense, no acknowledgement of how it impacted Biff, and certainly no evidence of godly sorrow. Biff finds himself struggling. He wants to forgive, and in some sense has, but he’s also weary. He wonders, Does she even see what she’s doing? Or is this just her way of avoiding hard conversations?

What Should Biff Do?

Biff should wait a day or two, letting the emotional dust settle, and then approach Mable with a gentle, truth-filled conversation. Something like this:

“Hey Mable, I want to talk with you about the other day. I did say I forgive you, and I meant that, but I’ve been thinking about how we handle conflict. When you apologized, it felt more like something to check off than an honest reckoning with what actually happened. I want us to be able to confess to one another in ways that build trust, not just move on quickly. What you said not just hurt, but it’s a pattern in our lives. For us to truly move on, we need to have a clear sin plan, which is the doctrine of repentance taught at Life Over Coffee. May we take a look at the webinar and talk through confession, forgiveness, and how to change so these patterns do not keep recurring?”

This kind of loving clarity can invite Mable into a deeper understanding of biblical confession—and the entire process of repentance. And perhaps it would open her eyes to her own patterns of self-protection or avoidance.

Other Thoughts for Both Parties

• For Mable: She needs to learn that true confession is not just about easing relational tension; it’s about exalting God by owning sin rightly. She should ask herself: “Was my confession about loving Biff well, or just getting past the awkward moment?”
• For Biff: He must guard against resentment. He’s right to desire a more sincere confession, but his responsibility is to speak the truth in love, not stew in judgment. He should pray for courage, not bitterness.
• For Both: Biblical reconciliation is a slow, intentional, Spirit-dependent process. It thrives in clarity and dies in ambiguity. Vague apologies may seem polite, but they lack the power of a well-articulated act of personal prosecution.

Find all our graphics here.

Peace,
Rick