Get 10% off and FREE shipping on your first coffee subscription order.
You may want to read:
We have visited several churches that have small groups. Each has a form to fill out to express your interest, and they ask you to provide your age group. Every church I’ve ever been to wants small groups according to age. Am I the only one who is confused by this? What is the effectiveness of this method? I’m not sure if they do this because it is an easy way to group people or because it is the best way. Maybe I am not seeing this correctly, and someone could enlighten me. My husband and I attended a small group where members were of various ages and stages of life. There were grandparents, empty nesters, high schoolers’ parents, and small children’s parents.
In this small group, we experienced tremendous growth, were spiritually challenged, and had accountability. I enjoyed learning from older, wiser Christians who could say, “We went through that too, and this is how we made it.” If people are all the same age, they can share and relate to their issues, but few would have answers or wisdom about how to navigate those challenges or offering hope. (For the record, I get keeping singles and married folks separate, but other than that, I’m at a loss.) So my question remains: why do churches want to divide people into small groups according to their age? – Small Group Member
The Bible does not stipulate how to operate a small group. Thus, each church determines how they want to run theirs, which varies from church to church. Your first course of action is to talk to the leaders to find out why they have small groups the way they do. There is a purpose and freedom in play here since the Bible does not stipulate, so your preference is not out-of-line with God’s Word, but you want to recognize that each church has reasons for doing what they do. Our role as church members is to obey and support our leaders while engaging the contexts they provide to serve each other (Hebrews 13:17). Each believer or family must determine what they want while always supporting the local church on secondary issues. Though no church can meet every preference of every member, we must always seek to intentionally spur one another on to love and good works while using the means of grace the local church provides.
And let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near (Hebrews 10:24-25).
Realizing that we’re talking about preferences here and not biblical mandates is vital. I will share with you my preference for small groups, which are mixed groups of all ages. The education system and Sunday school are two of the few contexts in the world that are uni-generational. Virtually every other context where people come together is multi-generational, e.g., family, work, hobbies, fitness centers, shopping, church, etc. In all of these contexts, nobody thinks twice about the multi-generational makeup of these gatherings. Thus, a small group with mixed generations looks like the rest of our lives. However, in academic learning environments and Sunday school, there is an emphasis on uni-generational contexts due to everyone learning in a structured and sequenced manner.
For example, you would not want a first-grader in a sixth-grade classroom. But what better equipping environment can you create than a mixed-generational small group in a local church that trains the saints to live well in all the other mixed-generation contexts of their lives?
People will naturally gravitate to their preferred kind, i.e., young kids will seek to play with kids their age. Married couples enjoy other married couples. There is nothing wrong with these types of connections. People pursuing like-minded people is a good thing. Typically, you do not have to push for kind-to-kind connections because we do it naturally. We find someone we click with, and we build relationships with them. However, if you want something more than peer-to-peer, like-minded interactions, you’ll have to create it intentionally. Just as there are benefits to kind-to-kind relationships, there are many blessings that come from mixed groups. Let me share a few examples.
If you want a dynamic small group experience, you must do more than have a mixed group of individuals from various backgrounds and ages. You should also have an intentional plan to build into the small group members’ lives. I talked about this in a prior chapter, but I want to revisit it here because some may think that you only need a small group meeting to do life well together. In all my years of leading a small group, most of the sanctification has happened outside of the small group meeting. It occurs in these smaller groups where a person is more willing to be vulnerable, transparent, and honest about the things that are critical to them. The least number of people in the room is your best chance to get folks to open up about their deepest concerns. The graphic explains the deliberate strategy my wife and I used when we led small groups.
Suppose the church’s culture lacks a robust, transparent, vulnerable, honest, courageous, charitable, authentic gospel DNA, as I have been outlining in this book. In that case, it will not be easy to build a sanctification group within that local body. These values do not work well in a subset (small group) of the local church if the larger body is not embracing these ideas. However, in a church that values relationships, as I have outlined, it will be easier for the shepherds on the ground to lead their small groups into deeper, transformative relationships. Of course, all this begins with the leadership and their spouses. If the leaders and spouses are not living in and benefiting from biblical koinonia, the small group leaders can’t learn, live, and export it to the greater church body.
Rick launched the Life Over Coffee global training network in 2008 to bring hope and help for you and others by creating resources that spark conversations for transformation. His primary responsibilities are resource creation and leadership development, which he does through speaking, writing, podcasting, and educating.
In 1990 he earned a BA in Theology and, in 1991, a BS in Education. In 1993, he received his ordination into Christian ministry, and in 2000 he graduated with an MA in Counseling from The Master’s University. In 2006 he was recognized as a Fellow of the Association of Certified Biblical Counselors (ACBC).