Ep. 357 Response to The Rise and Fall of Mars Hill, Episode 5

Ep. 357 Response to The Rise and Fall of Mars Hill, Episode 5

Photo: ©Minerva Studio via Canva.com

Shows Main Idea – This review is of episode five in The Rise and Fall of Mars Hill podcast series from Christianity Today. It begins with a warning similar to the last episode about prescreening before listening to it with others. This episode is not just gross, but it could cause an abuse victim to struggle after listening to it. If you know a person in an abusive situation or working through abuse, please use caution before recommending this episode.

Life Over Coffee · Ep. 357 Response to The Rise and Fall of Mars Hill, Episode 5

Show Notes

You may want to read:

Episode Five: The Things We Do to Women

My aim in working through these episodes is to help folks think through the church they attend, the leadership culture of their church, and, potentially, identify things that might not be apparent. I will not provide a “Monday morning play-by-play” critique. I hope you will gain personal insight through this review as well as applications to your teachers and the church you attend.

1 – Masculinity Niche

According to Christianity Today’s (Proverbs 18:17) sound bites in the first five episodes, Mark Driscoll had a hyper-complementarian worldview, which is different from a complementarian worldview. As stated in the last episode, Mark built the church on a specific niche—masculinity. Masculinity, gender, and sex were a running theme in the preaching diet of Mars Hill.

2 – Polar Opposites

They asked Kristin Du Mez to weigh on this problem. (She’s the woke author of Jesus and John Wayne.) She says this type of “masculinity-centered worldview” comes from the post-WWII Cold War era. She’s only about 2,000 years off in her assessment since the Bible teaches hierarchy, manhood, womanhood, complementarianism, leadership, and submission. It is mind-boggling and frustrating that CT would use this author to investigate what went wrong at Mars Hill. The masculinity that CT presents has two extremes.

  • On one side, you have the gross, hyper-masculine, skewed teaching of Mark Driscoll.
  • On the other side, they draw from woke activists, non-believers, and others who do not hold a sufficiency of Scripture worldview. (There are a few exceptions.)

3 – A Better Way

It would be better for CT to talk about a harsh, crude, crass, gross, angry, authoritarian preacher who preached some ideas found in the Bible—using the Bible to make a better case for where he was wrong. Unfortunately, Christianity Today clouded the clarity they could have presented from God’s Word. For example, they could have said,

Here is what God’s Word says about complementarianism, manhood, womanhood, leadership, submission, and authority. The Bible teaches all of these concepts, not the way Mark Driscoll did. So, before you throw the preacher and the ideas out, research the Bible to see how many of the concepts are in Scripture.

4 – Unqualified Pastor

There is no question that Mark Driscoll is not qualified to be a shepherd based on the plethora of sound bites from the first five episodes. Mark Driscoll put many women at risk to their husbands. He also warped the hearers with his messages—if they believed everything he taught. Mark had a biblically immature audience, though not entirely. And he did not shepherd them well. Mark did not care for their souls.

He manipulated them, showboated, built his brand, and went on a wild ego-trip with no accountability. I am not faulting the Mars Hill audience but saying they were vulnerable to a wolf-like person. If you fill a room with a group of new or non-Christians and put someone like Mark Driscoll in front of them, there is no way it can go well.

5 – Rachel Denhollander

As Rachel Denhollander said, “[He] gave them a false gospel and a false god.” An illustration of this was at the three-quarter way through the podcast, where they talked about Mark’s view about oral sex. It was an eisegetical rant and grossly out-of-bounds. Thankfully, CT did talk to Rachel Denhollander in this episode. An evangelical who loves the Lord has a sufficiency of Scripture worldview, which is a departure from many of their interviewees.

6 – Is It Worth It?

CT does ask a good question at the end of the podcast. They say, “It works, but is that the right question? It’s not ‘is it working,’ but is it worth the damage?” I fully concur with focusing on the damage more than the results. If you’re only results-oriented, you can blind yourself to your methods. We must scrutinize the process while asking the Lord to bring the results.

7 – Is This Series Worth It?

I do not recommend this series for three reasons:

  1. Mark Driscoll is a gross person who is potentially dangerous to listen to for several reasons. Rehashing sound bites from his messages can (1) trigger the hurting, (2) confuse the Bible novice, and (3) affirm the cynic who walked away from Jesus.
  2. If the goal is storytelling, this series will entertain you. It’s well done. But if the problem is Mark Driscoll’s poor teaching, they should put forth better teaching than rehashing what went wrong or interviewing folks who are not beholding to sound teaching.
  3. Christianity Today uses several feminists, unbelievers, woke, and other folks who do not have a sufficiency of Scripture worldview. This podcast is like listening to a left-leaning new program (i.e., CNN) critiquing the alt-right.

Need More Help?

  1. If you want to learn more from us, you may search this site for thousands of resources—articles, podcasts, videos, graphics, and more. Please spend time studying the ones that interest you. They are free.
  2. If you want to talk to us, we have private forums for those who support this ministry financially. Please consider supporting us here if you would like to help us keep our resources free.

Learn How to Become a Mastermind Student01

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Filed Under: